On 10/17/06, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > I think the big question is whether... > > That's because whether or not 2617 is revised, 2616 needs to clarify > when encoding of headers is required. The /first/ question is whether the IETF is a suitable venue. I am not the only person wondering, so I'll reiterate: > How do efforts to update these specs relate to the normative folklore > regarding mandatory to implement security technologies? -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:49:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT