W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag"

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:34:36 +0200
Message-ID: <45329B5C.3010009@gmx.de>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
> 
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:13:41 +0200, Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> So shouldn't RFC2616 (Section 3.10) stop defining these things, and 
>> just normatively refer to RFC4626 for the definition of "Language-Tag"?
> 
> Wouldn't BCP47 be better?

For now it's the same thing, so this doesn't really answer the question.

With respect to referring to the BCP# instead of the RFC# -- I don't 
think that's a good idea as long as you want to refer to a specific 
version of a specification...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 15 October 2006 20:34:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT