Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag"

Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
> 
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 14:13:41 +0200, Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> So shouldn't RFC2616 (Section 3.10) stop defining these things, and 
>> just normatively refer to RFC4626 for the definition of "Language-Tag"?
> 
> Wouldn't BCP47 be better?

For now it's the same thing, so this doesn't really answer the question.

With respect to referring to the BCP# instead of the RFC# -- I don't 
think that's a good idea as long as you want to refer to a specific 
version of a specification...

Best regards, Julian