Things get onto the errata list when someone writes up an errata and we get 'rough consensus' on this list. http://purl.org/NET/http-errata is currently maintained by Scott Lawrence. Scott? I think it needs someone to write up what they think the errata should say, and for us to get some agreement about it. Including the text on eTag, if we're looking at clarification of original intent rather than new protocol capabilities. LarryReceived on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 01:26:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:29 GMT