RE: RFC2616 revision, was: I-D ACTION:draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt

That's a good idea.

Still doesn't solve the problem of getting people to *read* and *verify*
the results, which is the fundamental sticking point, IMHO.  So far, no
promises from anyone I've heard.
			- Jim


On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Maybe we could evaluate whether the downlevel references from
> HTTP might qualify under the guidelines of BCP 97, RFC 3967
> ("Clarifying when Standards Track Documents may Refer Normatively
>   to Documents at a Lower Level"), since that seemed to be
> the sticking point last time we looked at this (which was before
> RFC 3967 was around).
> 
> Larry
> 
>