W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: RFC2616 revision, was: I-D ACTION:draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt

From: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:39:11 -0500
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1141670352.10952.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

That's a good idea.

Still doesn't solve the problem of getting people to *read* and *verify*
the results, which is the fundamental sticking point, IMHO.  So far, no
promises from anyone I've heard.
			- Jim


On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Maybe we could evaluate whether the downlevel references from
> HTTP might qualify under the guidelines of BCP 97, RFC 3967
> ("Clarifying when Standards Track Documents may Refer Normatively
>   to Documents at a Lower Level"), since that seemed to be
> the sticking point last time we looked at this (which was before
> RFC 3967 was around).
> 
> Larry
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 18:40:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:42 GMT