W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:58:55 +0100
Message-ID: <440867BF.6080009@gmx.de>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Martin Duerst wrote:
> A very tiny adjustment below. But since HTTP (RFC 2616) is still
> at Draft Standard, couldn't this kind of clarification be added
> in when going to Standard? Or is that the plan?

As far as I can tell, there doesn't seem to be any kind of activity of 
updating RFC2616 (sad enough). But yes, should it ever be updated, I 
would expect it to incorporate whatever this document says in the end.

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 16:00:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:42 GMT