W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: PUT vs strong ETags

From: Scott Lawrence <scott@skrb.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:18:33 -0500
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1133356713.4524.5.camel@sukothai.pingtel.com>

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:12 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> > 

> > The use of the term "requested variant" is consistent with the use in
> > section 14.19 and elsewhere in the spec. It refers to the resource
> > identified by the request URI regardless of the method used.
> 
> Now that's certainly not obvious, and it would be nice if this would 
> appear somewhere in the errata.

Before I add anything to the errata, I ask that specific text be posted
to the WG list and that it gets rough consensus there.

-- 
Scott Lawrence
http://skrb.org/scott/
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 13:18:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:41 GMT