- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:03:08 -0800
- To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I like the general approach; the language needs a little adjustment (the last sentence could be read in the wrong way); but I think the sentiment is "just because you don't get a POE-Links back on an OPTIONS, don't assume it isn't a POE resource," which seems right (if unfortunate -- it would be really nice to be able to ask a resource and get a definitive answer!). Cheers, On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > How about this: > > POE-Links in OPTIONS responses > > Resources MAY return the POE-Links header in OPTIONS responses. POE > resources SHOULD announce their poe-ness by sending > > POE-Links: . > > in response to OPTIONS requests. If no POE-Links header is seen in an > options response, a client MUST NOT deduce anything about the poe-ness > of the resource. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 22:03:21 UTC