On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Alex Rousskov wrote: > The bottom line: do you have any objections to fixing the RFC by > saying "proxies MUST NOT forward hop-by-hop headers" explicitly? If > yes, what are those objections? Sorry, I wasn't clear ... I've no issue with that change ... > > Let's leave the second change (i.e., listing hop-by-hop headers in the > Connection header) aside, for now. Yes, my issue is with specifications around clarification of what a "hop-by-hop" header is. Dave MorrisReceived on Friday, 16 July 2004 20:42:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:28 GMT