W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation?

From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:42:01 +0100
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040712204201.GB26612@mail.shareable.org>

Alex Rousskov wrote:
> I do not see a compelling reason to make an exception for
> Transfer-Encoding. Do you?

Yes.  The reason is similar to making an exception for Connection.
Any agent which parses and understands Connection (i.e. to filter out
named headers) _must_ also understand and parse Transfer-Encoding, as
it determines the message boundary.

Therefore there is nothing to be gained by putting Transfer-Encoding
in Connection.  Mentioning it is always redundant.

This isn't true of the other hop-by-hop headers.

-- Jamie
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 16:42:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:35 GMT