W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: draft-gettys-http-v11-spec-rev-00 status

From: Jim Gettys <Jim.Gettys@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:51:02 -0500
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: HTTP working group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1079970660.3433.15.camel@laptop.gettys.org>

Yes, Larry, I exist...

I've responded privately to a number of people over the last
few months....

Without knowing whether the area directors want
to move the spec's further soon and/or knowing
the state of specifications we depend on that block
it, I've been blissfully ignoring the problem, on the theory
that fewer drafts are better, both in terms of work
and in terms of the probability of getting people to read
drafts. I haven't heard many complaints on the new draft go by
since I issued it.

Should I pay attention again?  Can we find out what the
area directors want and/or the state of specs we depend on?
                         - Jim

On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 12:40, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Anyone hear from Jim Gettys lately? I thought he was going
> to march through the errata and create an issues list, but
> I haven't heard anything in a long time.
-- 
Jim Gettys <Jim.Gettys@hp.com>
HP Labs, Cambridge Research Laboratory
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 10:52:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:27 GMT