W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Proposed erratum to definition of "qdtext" in RFC 2616

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:29:01 -0700 (MST)
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0403151310510.17944@measurement-factory.com>


On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> I think the qdtext syntax should say this instead:
>
>        qdtext         = <any TEXT except <"> and "\">

I agree. The RFC 2616 rule is ambiguous. The intent is obvious (to me)
but the formal grammar should be fixed.

Alex.

Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 15:29:04 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alex Rousskov: "draft-gettys-http-v11-spec-rev-00 status"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Can the response entity be transmitted before all the request entity has been read?"
In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Proposed erratum to definition of "qdtext" in RFC 2616"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:22:11 GMT