W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Proposal for an HTTP ERR method

From: Scott Lawrence <scott@skrb.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:25:57 -0400
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>
Message-Id: <1088015157.4393.18.camel@sukothai.pingtel.com>

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 14:20, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> 
> > You let the server administrators figure it out.
> ...
> > and humans will see it and can figure out what it means.
> 
> If the bug-reporting protocol is designed to target humans, it should
> be optimized/tailored for human consumption. Henry's original premise
> was that the ERR protocol is designed to help future machines to fix
> themselves.

When we can demonstrate running code that can take advantage of this,
then it's time to determine what the requirements are for a protocol
extension to enable it, not the other way around.

-- 
Scott Lawrence
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:26:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:31 GMT