W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: PATCH, gdiff, and random-access I/O

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:06:31 +0200
Message-ID: <40921717.7050300@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Justin Chapweske <justin@chapweske.com>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, HTTP working group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>


Julian Reschke wrote:

> ...
> - it seems to do more than we need.
> ...

...for instance, GDIFF requires random access to the old file, while a 
simpler format may work on plain streams...

Regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 05:07:42 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: PATCH, gdiff, and random-access I/O"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: PATCH, gdiff, and random-access I/O"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: PATCH, gdiff, and random-access I/O"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: PATCH, gdiff, and random-access I/O"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: PATCH, gdiff, and random-access I/O"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:23 GMT