- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 16:55:44 -0700
- To: jamie@sharable.org
- Cc: Scott Lawrence <scott-http@skrb.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I think the errata in question is hinted at in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2004JanMar/0060.html but it would be nice to write up a summary of how the spec should actually change, so that we can judge 'consensus' on the proposed text. Note that Scott Lawrence maintains a HTTP errata page at http://purl.org/NET/http-errata > AFAIK, IETF does not have a formal mechanism for submitting errata. http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html says To report suspected errors that are more technical in nature, please verify the errors with the authors and/or appropriate area directors of the IESG before sending them to the RFC Editor for posting. In this case, though, we got the RFC editor to point to Scott's page. Jim Gettys claims that draft-gettys-http-v11-spec-rev-00.txt already includes all of the existing errata, so, once there is clear agreement, the change could also be incorporated. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2004 19:58:23 UTC