On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > If the Request-URI is an asterisk ("*"), the OPTIONS request is > > intended to apply to the server in general rather than to a > > specific resource. Since a server's communication options > > typically depend on the resource, the "*" request is only > > useful as a "ping" or "no-op" type of method; it does nothing > > beyond allowing the client to test the capabilities of the > > server. For example, this can be used to test a proxy for > > HTTP/1.1 compliance (or lack thereof). > > > > So there seems to be some assumption that HTTP/1.1 compliance has > > something to do with implementing OPTIONS (otherwise how could it > > be used as a test for HTTP/1.1 compliance?). > > Regardless of whether or not you get an error (or even which one you > get), you still get the servers claimed HTTP version in the response > line. > > I'm not sure what more that paragraph needs to say, or what's unclear > about it. What confuses people is probably that the text says "to test for compliance" rather than saying "to detect HTTP version". Since most HTTP/1.1 implementations are not HTTP/1.1 compliant but are using HTTP/1.1 version, the two statements are different. HTH, Alex.Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2003 16:51:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:28 GMT