W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: content-encoding and range headers

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@world.std.com>
Date: 10 Dec 2002 11:28:08 -0500
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Scott Lawrence" <lawrence@world.std.com>, "Stefan Eissing" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <uof7tu9d3.fsf@world.std.com>

"Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> writes:

> I agree that it depends on the definition of the entity body, which is [1]:
> 	entity-body := Content-Encoding( Content-Type( data ) )
> So I think Stefan's analysis is correct...

But Accept-Encoding does not _require_ the server to use the specified
encoding, it _offers_ to accept it.  So the request:

 GET /foo HTTP/1.1
 Host: example.com
 Accept-Encoding: gzip
 Range: 10000-19999

might return two completely different parts of /foo depending on
whether or not the server chose to apply the Content-Encoding.  Since
HTTP is stateless, you can't even count on any given server making the
same choice each time.

If you believe that interpretation, then I think you must conclude
that the combination is not very useful to the client.

The server I've worked on most didn't ever use Content-Encoding, so
it ignored Accept-Encoding.
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 11:28:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:36 UTC