W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: Entities

From: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200208201740.g7KHeQKw021901@wera.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
cc: "'Alex Rousskov'" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, "'Kim Horne'" <kim@pookzilla.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

I wrote:

> Probably if the example had included an explicit Content-length
> field in the first group of headers, the ambiguity would go
> away, but I think the Message Length rules (section 4.4) don't
> require that.

Roy Fielding writes:

  There is no ambiguity.  No content-length in a request means length == 0.

My mistake.  I must have missed the part of RFC2616 that says
this.  In fact, I still can't find it; perhaps you could point
out the specific normative language?

Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:44:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 October 2015 05:36:13 UTC