-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 9/11/09 7:04 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: > >> We (Dojo toolkit) have been using REST Channels [1] for clients >> to receive real-time notifications of resource updates. >> Could/should we use the "hub" relation for resources to reference >> the URI that Dojo/clients connect to for updates? And if so it >> seems like "updates" or "notifications" would be a more generic, >> fitting term than "hub" (but "hub" isn't bad). > > I like "updates" or "notifications" -- "hub" seems specific to > pubsubhubbub, whereas the pointer might be to a SIP notifications > service, an XMPP PubSub service, or who knows what. Actually, didn't SIP already define a relation name of "monitor" (and "monitor-group" for notification of resource changes [1]? Why wouldn't we follow that precedent (pubsubhubbub could use "monitor" that couldn't they?). Or does monitor/monitor-group imply something different? [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe-02#section-5.1 - -- Kris Zyp SitePen (503) 806-1841 http://sitepen.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqqexQACgkQ9VpNnHc4zAyxFQCgrWnBMLIq4Qkl+e9EC78e5SfU f+sAoIrY6DDdyogMRQPMSM7l2WDaMCAP =OZpi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 16:31:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:39 GMT