W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:15:43 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uy7k8hwv64w2qv@annevk-t60>

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:08:55 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> It will be invalid.

As far as I can tell the draft does not define what it means for something to be invalid. Even if it did, presumably that still leaves my remaining two points.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:16:28 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:39 GMT