Julian Reschke wrote: > ... >> So, I'm not fussed either way. > > OK, so let's leave things as they are for now. > ... I have applied the proposed patch with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/684>. It seems we can close issue 172 -- we can still change the registry requirements later on if we change our position on that. BR, JulianReceived on Sunday, 16 August 2009 10:52:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:39 GMT