Adam Barth wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote: > >>> In a sense, the same argument could be advanced about any browser >>> feature (CSS, <canvas>, etc). This shouldn't stop us from innovating. >>> >> this is security we're talking about though, not additional nice-to-have >> features. Again, we still need to secure all users, and can't wait until >> deployment of some new header. >> > > It is impossible to secure all the users who visit your Web site. You > cannot secure users with IE5 or Firefox 1.0, for example. Moreover, > the header provides incremental value while it is being deployed. > > Do you have any more information on this you could refer me to? I find it hard to believe that there can be no security scheme which would be browser-independent. Regards Adrien -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.comReceived on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 01:32:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:35 GMT