tor 2009-06-18 klockan 22:34 +1200 skrev Adrien de Croy: > OK. that's the approach I've taken, but it leads to much lower cache > utilisation, Sure, but nothing really breaks from it, apart from the users experience of (and cost of visiting) the affected sites... If you want to do something productive in this area then try to investigate WHY these sites sends both "don't ever cache this" together with valid cache validators. It's possible they all share some common framework which simply overlooked this fact, and if you can address that you get the major sites addressed pretty quickly (year, not decades)... Regards HenrikReceived on Thursday, 18 June 2009 10:48:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:38 GMT