Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> +1 to just removing the language around C-L; DIGIT is unambiguous.

+1.

> Julian, not sure where JS comes into it - ref?

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008OctDec/0421.html>

The problem was feeding the value into the JavaScript's parseInt() (not 
specifying the base), and the actual value having a leading zero.

I'd argue this is a documentation/education problem related to 
JavaScript, not HTTP.

BR, Julian