W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:34:28 +0200
Message-ID: <48D3B874.6020105@gmx.de>
To: Charles Fry <fry@google.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Brian McBarron <bpm@google.com>, gears-eng@googlegroups.com, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> 

Charles Fry wrote:
> ...
>  - Regarding ETags vs. URLs, one point of reference for me is CGI
> scripts. A single CGI script running behind a fixed URL should (in my
> mind) be able to perform a resumable upload, but this would require a
> unique identification mechanism other than the URL.
> ...

Really? How about a query parameter?

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 14:35:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:33 GMT