Mark Nottingham wrote: > >But I agree that you might be able to use existing URL-based front-end > >load-balancing kit, and that might reduce the cost of implementation > >substantially. > > Is there a hidden assumption there that this is done in hardware? No. By "kit" I mean readily available hardware and/or software, which does URL-based affinity HTTP request forwarding for load balancing. -- JamieReceived on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 11:26:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:33 GMT