Re: "Variant" language in Content-Location (Issue 109)

Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Is there a need to express the client's expectation that the 
> "Content-Location" URL will only have a single entity associated with 
> it? Or is a client expected to follow "Content-Location"s for a number 
> of times?

I wouldn't want to encourage that case, but would anything break if that 
happened?

BR, Julian