At 14:41 08/03/27, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >My reading is that HTTP is limited to iso-8859-1 *on the wire*, and >requires RFC2047 encoding for characters outside of that range. Do you >disagree with that? That's what's written in RFC 2616. The question is whether and to what extent that's (still) sensible in practice. >My intent was not to disallow RFC2047, but rather to allow other >encodings into iso-8859-1 where appropriate. What do you mean by "other encodings into iso-8859-1"? Please explain. >Disallowing RFC2047 would >be foolish and counter-productive; however, no one has said why >constraining future headers from using other encodings than RFC2047 is >a desirable -- or even realistic -- thing to do. > >I'll follow up in more detail soon... Looking forward to it. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jpReceived on Thursday, 27 March 2008 10:19:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:29 GMT