Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?)

Frank Ellermann wrote:
>> 1) s/1806/2183/g (this is editorial, methinks)
> 
> +1
> ...

I just noticed that in a different place, the spec cites RFC 1806 and 
then goes on saying it was updated by RFC 2183. Citing RFC 1806 seems to 
be only useful in order to tell the history of the header, which I think 
isn't what the HTTP spec is for.

Thus I'd propose to get rid of the RFC 1806 reference, and streamline 
the prose accordingly.

BR, Julian