W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

100-continue implementation status question

From: Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:07:23 -0700
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2FC8F872D7B3F342B2777A39E7F3E6BB02C884A534@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

Can people help with the following question:
How widely implemented is 100-continue? And how correctly?

Thanks,

Paul

Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 05:08:01 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: 100-continue implementation status question"
Previous message: Yves Lafon: "Re: i28 proposed replacement text"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: 100-continue implementation status question"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: 100-continue implementation status question"
Reply: Tim Olsen: "Re: 100-continue implementation status question"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:30 GMT