Henrik Nordstrom schrieb: > sön 2007-02-18 klockan 10:24 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > >> That's of course ok as well, but at this point we can't be sure that >> there will be a RFC2616bis anytime soon. > > Well, to get there we can only do our best in updating the document and > correct the issues seen and trying to get it accepted. > > I very much prefer getting RFC2616bis out as a draft with the minimum > needed updates compared to having complementary drafts published which > doesn't even intend to become an RFC.. So it really should be on the issues list (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/>) then. Mark, could you please add it? Best regards, JulianReceived on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:38:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:25 GMT