sön 2007-02-18 klockan 10:24 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > That's of course ok as well, but at this point we can't be sure that > there will be a RFC2616bis anytime soon. Well, to get there we can only do our best in updating the document and correct the issues seen and trying to get it accepted. I very much prefer getting RFC2616bis out as a draft with the minimum needed updates compared to having complementary drafts published which doesn't even intend to become an RFC.. Regards HenrikReceived on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:14:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:25 GMT