Am 28.06.2007 um 22:43 schrieb Henrik Nordstrom: > tor 2007-06-28 klockan 13:24 -0700 skrev Jeffrey Mogul: > >> Which means, I think, that the right way to solve Cyrus's >> problem is probably the one he suggested -- add an optional >> method to the PUT request that causes PUT to return the resulting >> entity. > > And the exact same method could be used in PATCH for the same > purpose.. Without any smugness: you mean header not method, right? //StefanReceived on Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:49:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:27 GMT