Mark Nottingham wrote: > It's late here, so I may be missing something, but I believe those are > the same, yes. :) He copied the wrong URL :). i64 is a dup of i62. -- Dan > > > On 13/06/2007, at 12:10 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i64 >> >> That's a duplicate of >> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i64>, isn't it? >> >> Best regards, Julian > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 14:53:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:27 GMT