On 7 Jun 2007, at 16:54, Julian Reschke wrote: > > How is "Accept-Content" different from "Accept" (<http:// > greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.14.1>)? And i wrote: > should of course have referred to "Accept-Type" :-) don't i look like a plonker now! maybe i'll go do some gardening instead... The header is just confusingly named, i keep thinking it's the "Accept-content-type-header-formats thing" > Also, I find talking about resolution-dependent stylesheets about > surprising, as a CSS can be written in a resolution-independent > way, right? Maybe you should only use bitmap images as examples. Images, and anything that refers to images would need to support it. You may have existing content that is named foo-hires.jpeg and foo- lowres.jpeg and want to switch between them without doing the negotiation on the images themselves (so that old references don't need to be fixed) - Nicholas.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:27 GMT