Hi, can we please mark the following issues as closed? - Issue 45 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i45>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i45-rfc977-reference>. - Issue 46 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i46>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i46-rfc1700_remove>. - Issue 47 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i47>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i47-inconsistency-in-date-format-explanation>. - Issue 48 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i48>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i48-date-reference-typo>. Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 28 May 2007 12:11:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:27 GMT