W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:27 +0100
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1162767627.8345.57.camel@henriknordstrom.net> 
sön 2006-11-05 klockan 14:54 -0800 skrev Lisa Dusseault:

> Does anybody have counter-examples of clients handling Vary properly  
> and sites benefiting from that?

Squid has cached Vary responses for quite some time (4 years now) with
good results, both to clients (when used as internet proxy) and servers
(when used as surrogate / reverse proxy).

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 23:00:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:24 GMT