Re: Etag-on-write, 2nd attempt (== IETF draft 01)

Julian Reschke wrote:
> The problem here is the definition of "semantic effect". It all depends 
> on the client. An XCAP client will not consider XML reformatting to be 
> important, as long as the Infoset is preserved.

Even if there is a proxy cache in the network between the XCAP client
and the server, and the proxy cache does partial discard of large
entities, and byte-range requests (with If-Match) to refresh them?

I think even an XCAP client would be lost in that case.

-- Jamie