Re: I-D ACTION:draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt

Jim Gettys wrote:
> I did prepare a draft for full standard with all errata of the time
> included, *and* submitted it, IIRC.
> 
> There were no comments at the time, and there were open dependencies, so
> it could not progress.
> 
> I will not bother to prepare another until someone can tell me with a
> straight face that 1) all the dependencies have made it to full
> standard, and therefore it won't be a waste of time, 2) at least 2

I just checked, and the various MIME RFCs are still at "draft", so I 
don't think that HTTP can progress.

On the other hand, I think a revised version would be usefuk, even if it 
needs to stay at the "draft" level.

> people commit to me personally they will bother to check it for
> editorial errors.
> 
> Even then, I don't know when I'd have time to prepare another draft.
> 			Regards,
> 				- Jim

Best regards, Julian