Actually, I remember sending a few emails with feedback on this and not getting any replies, and then I went on my honeymoon, so it wasn't quite on my mind for a while. I think that document is the way to go, even if all it ends up saying is something similar to what you have in the CalDAV draft. -wsv On Jun 20, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > We basically tried that. What it turned into was this <http:// > www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt> with > no consensus on the basic model or apparent drive to come to > consensus. Got any feedback on that draft?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:24 GMT