Helge Hess wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On Feb 15, 2005, at 12:59, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> recently different communities (caldav/groupdav, atompup (protocol >> part)) have been discussing how to use HTTP to author new resources when >> the URL namespace is completely server-controlled, thus PUT just doesn't >> fit well. > > > I still disagree (apparently CalDAV does too), but anyway ;-) > >> I've submitted a first draft as "draft-reschke-http-addmember-00". Note >> that it also contains an appendix covering possible alternative >> approaches. > > > If we create a new method, I would like to ask for the possibility to > return multiple resources. The one situation which doesn't fit well with > PUT+location is a PUT of a cyclic event which is flattened by the server > to multiple resources. So how would you define the semantics for that in a generic way? A multi-part request body? (please follow up on ietf-http-wg@w3.org) Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 13:04:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:23 GMT