Hi, RFC2616, section 3.20 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#header.expect>) defines the "Expect" header with extensibility in mind, but doesn't mention any registration process. Is this an oversight? Who can legitimately define new extensions (did this happen so far?)? I'd assume that an IETF standards track document can do this (in the same way as it already occurs for method names and request/response headers). Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 21 January 2005 10:58:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:23 GMT