Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation?

Jeffrey Mogul wrote:
>        All hop-by-hop headers (other than Connection) MUST be listed
>        in the Connection header.

Again, existing implementations don't list Transfer-Encoding in the
Connection header.  This is very common and conforming behaviour.

Is this proposal meant to imply that all such existing implementations
are no longer conforming?

-- Jamie