Hopefully this will get on the "errata" page... > -----Original Message----- > From: Melman, Howard [mailto:Howard@silverstream.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:49 AM > To: HTTP WG > Cc: Joris Dobbelsteen; Paul Leach; Melman, Howard > Subject: RE: can charsets be quoted. > > > > On Wednesday Feb 7, 2001, Paul Leach wrote: > > > I believe that the word token is being used two different ways. > > This way: > > value = token | quoted-string > > and in this sentence: > > HTTP character sets are identified by case-insensitive tokens. > > > > The first one is a formal ABNF definition, the second is not. I.e., > > there was no intent to say that char-set IDs have to be "tokens" as that > > is specified in the HTTP ABNF. > > > > I would say that it is perfectly legal for them to be quoted. > > I agree. But I think the spec could be clearer in two ways. > I think the ABNF should be removed from 3.4 (since it's not > intended) and I think the word "token" should be replaced > with the word "name" in all cases in section 3.4. The IANA > does not refer to charset tokens, but rather charset names. > See RFC 1700 or > http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets > > Howard >Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 17:57:34 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:41 EDT