W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 2000

RE: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence

From: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM <kugler@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:44:45 -0700
To: "Joris Dobbelsteen" <joris.dobbelsteen@mail.com>
Cc: "'http-wg'" <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-ID: <OF0D8A775F.245CBCA4-ON8725698F.005BE688@LocalDomain>

My copy of MSIE 5.50.4134.0600 has a checkbox for "Use TLS 1.0".

     -Carl



"Joris Dobbelsteen" <joris.dobbelsteen@mail.com> on 11/05/2000 10:21:53 AM

To:   "'http-wg'" <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence



Better head for SSL, since I don't know any browsers that actually support
TLS (MSIE doesn't, I think)...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hodges@breakaway.Stanford.EDU
> [mailto:hodges@breakaway.Stanford.EDU]On Behalf Of
> Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com
> Sent: Friday, 03 November 2000 23:39
> To: http-wg
> Subject: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence
>
>
> Ok, so now I'm postulating a server-side gizmo speaking "HTTP 1.0 |
> 1.1"-over-SSL/TLS that tries its best to have such
> connections be persistent.
>
> What do browsers typically do in ~this~ case -- how long
> before they'll
> timeout an idle connection if the user causes it to connect
> and then walks
> away for whatever reason?
>
> thanks,
>
> JeffH
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 16:47:12 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:40 EDT