W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 2000

RE: HTTP/1.1: RFC2068 versus RFC2616, RFC1590 versus RFC2048

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 11:59:26 -0400
To: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@mail.cern.ch>, <jg@w3.org>, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <001e01c01c09$42d96240$954768c0@oyster.agranat.com>

> In section 3.7 "Media Types", the earlier RFC2068 refers
> correctly to RFC2048 in relation to IANA registrations, but the
> later RFC still refers to the obsoleted RFC1590.

> I don't see any mention of this on the HTTP/1.1 Specification
> Errata page at
> http://www.agranat.com/fs/public/lawrence/http_errata.html
> either.

> Maybe an item should be added to the errata, calling for the
> reference to RFC1590 to be corrected to RFC2048?

Done.
 
 http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#media-reg
 
--
Scott Lawrence         Architect             <slawrence@virata.com>
Virata             http://www.virata.com/         http://emweb.com/
Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 17:03:57 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:39 EDT