Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued

Hi,

John Stracke wrote:

> > In turn, your proposal would result in an average tenfold increase in the
> > hardware requirement for servers, as well as waste of energy to power all those
> > CPUs, all for no good reason at all. Or the alternative would be a tenfold
> > increase in average web server latency, given no hardware upgrade.
>
> Just because a client always asks to upgrade doesn't mean the server has to obey.

So how does that make the draft useful if the upgrade is never allowed ?

--
for a good time, try kill -9 -1