W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 2000

Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued

From: Julien Pierre <jpierre@netscape.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 15:32:22 -0700
Message-ID: <3911FA76.9D4D3BAC@netscape.com>
To: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
CC: IETF HTTP List <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

John Stracke wrote:

> > In turn, your proposal would result in an average tenfold increase in the
> > hardware requirement for servers, as well as waste of energy to power all those
> > CPUs, all for no good reason at all. Or the alternative would be a tenfold
> > increase in average web server latency, given no hardware upgrade.
> Just because a client always asks to upgrade doesn't mean the server has to obey.

So how does that make the draft useful if the upgrade is never allowed ?

for a good time, try kill -9 -1

Received on Thursday, 4 May 2000 23:33:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:24 UTC