Scott Lawrence wrote: > Part of the goal here is to show how secured and unsecured traffic in any > protocol can share a TCP well known port, so that we can get away from > assigning two ports to each protocol. But aren't there security benefits to having separate ports (e.g., making it possible to run your secure server in a separate process)? -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/Received on Tuesday, 29 June 1999 17:51:41 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:31 EDT