W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1999

Re: Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1 draft available

From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:47:55 +0000
Message-ID: <3778F8BB.A61C4F20@ecal.com>
To: "Http-Wg@Hplb. Hpl. Hp. Com" <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Scott Lawrence wrote:

> Part of the goal here is to show how secured and unsecured traffic in any
> protocol can share a TCP well known port, so that we can get away from
> assigning two ports to each protocol.

But aren't there security benefits to having separate ports (e.g., making it
possible to run your secure server in a separate process)?

--
/=============================================================\
|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|francis@ecal.com|============================================|
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal Corp.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
\=============================================================/
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 1999 17:51:41 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:31 EDT