- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:20:34 PST
- To: "Jaye, Dan" <DJaye@engage.com>
- Cc: 'HTTP Working Group' <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
(Trying to limit the cc's) > We have received positive interest from current user agent and server > implementers for draft-ietf-http-trust-state-mgt-02.txt. However, given > current widespread acceptance of current cookie implementations and > default handling, there is no impetus for implementation. My > understanding and opinion is, however, that the implementers of the most > ubiquitous user agents will not fully implement state-man-mec-10.txt and > all of its recommendations and defaults without some solution like > trust-state-mgt. Conditions under which someone might use state-man-mec sound like things that might belong in an applicability statement for it. I suggest you consider pursuing draft-ietf-http-trust-state-mgt-02.txt as an individual contribution "Experimental" RFC. If the IESG chooses, it could reference it in the applicability statement. Larry
Received on Thursday, 18 March 1999 15:26:23 UTC