W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1999

Re: disposition of draft-ietf-http-* internet drafts

From: Dave Kristol <dmk@bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:18:05 -0500
Message-Id: <36EFC7AD.9C532176@bell-labs.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, Keith Moore <moore+iesg@cs.utk.edu>, "Patrik F\Bltstr\Bm" <paf@swip.net>, HTTP Working Group <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> > Yes and no.  The applicability statement needs to be revised.  But the
> > real problem IMO is that state-man-mec is caught in IESG process hell,
> > with some current IESG members unhappy with wording that was accepted by
> > former IESG members.
> 
> I don't think this is an accurate description of the problem.

Fair enough.  I'd really like to understand.  What *is* the problem that
prevents an I-D that was last-called before July, 1998, from advancing
to RFC status or being dropped outright?

Dave Kristol
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 1999 15:20:09 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:30 EDT