Re: ADAMS1, point 31. (cachability of methods).

Jeff says:
> 
> But if this is all too much for a last-minute change, then I
> propose resolving ADAMS31 by not changing anything (relative
> to -rev-05).  I started down this path by complaining about
> Jim's proposed change in
>    http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/hypermail/1998q4/0142.html
> and trying to put his words in the right part of the document.
> I suspect we will survive if we just leave this part of -rev-05 alone.
> 
> -Jeff

OK, we'll keep it as is.